Mrs Playmen Review 2025 Tv Show Series Cast Crew Online
The seven-episode limited series Mrs Playmen (2025) presents a stylish and ambitious — if uneven — dramatization of the life of Italian publisher and editor Adelina Tattilo, whose magazine Playmen helped spark conversations around sexuality, women’s liberation and media censorship in 1970s Italy. The show is directed by Riccardo Donna, scripted by Mario Ruggeri and others, and features a strong lead performance from Carolina Crescentini as Tattilo. Set against a bustling Rome of cocktail parties, magazine launches and cultural shifts, the series opens in 1970 and uses the backdrop of the magazine world to explore broader social issues — divorce, censorship, female desire, the Catholic Church’s influence and the tension between tradition and modernization.
From its first moments, Mrs Playmen immerses the viewer in the glitz and moral anxiety of the moment: the magazine launch for the issue featuring “Sister BB” (a nod to the daring cover of Playmen) sets the tone: sex as spectacle, but also as a battleground for agency. The early episodes establish Tattilo’s position: married to co-founder Saro Balsamo (portrayed by Francesco Colella), she initially occupies the conventional domestic space, trusted to assist in the business, but when her husband disappears under financial and legal pressure, Tattilo is forced to step up, pivoting the magazine’s editorial direction and becoming the face of resistance.
A major strength of the series is its atmosphere and production design. The recreation of Rome in the early 1970s — from the Piper Club nightlife, to the magazine newsroom overlooking St Peter’s, to the tension between seduction and solemnity — is textured and alluring. The soundtrack, including Italian hits and more modern covers, helps the tone land as both nostalgic and relevant. The shift in tone when Playmen becomes an instrument of female agency is perhaps the central dramatic pivot: Tattilo moves the magazine away from purely provocative imagery toward giving “ordinary women” a voice; one storyline involves a young woman Elsa (Francesca Colucci) whose nude photos are published without her fully informed consent and whose subsequent victimisation becomes a moral turning point in the narrative for Tattilo.
Narratively, the strength of Mrs Playmen lies in how it uses the magazine as a microcosm of Italy’s wider culture wars. The interplay between censorship (the magazine faces obscenity accusations), the Church’s sway, the emerging feminist movement, and the latent hypocrisies around sexuality provide a compelling scaffold. As one critic wrote, the series “offers a glossy dive into 1970s Rome and its moral codes”. he scenes in which Tattilo states unapologetically “We Italians have a problem with sex. Instead of relaxing us, it pisses us off,” capture a defiant voice for the series.
Carolina Crescentini anchors the show well. Her portrayal of Tattilo is confident, thoughtful and nuanced: she is at once part of the system (Catholic, married, mother of three) and its challenger. The internal contradictions — of desire and respectability, of commerce and culture — are embodied in her performance. The supporting cast is solid: Giuseppe Maggio as photographer Luigi Poggi, Francesca Colucci as Elsa, Filippo Nigro as Chartroux, and others form a newsroom ensemble that reflects the era’s energy.
However, the series also suffers from notable weaknesses. Critics point out that while the premise is provocative, the execution can feel safe and formulaic. One review judged it “a repetitive showreel,” observing that the show moves at a brisk pace but often reduces the story to highlight-after-highlight without really immersing the viewer in the struggle and process. For example, major obstacles — legal troubles, financial collapse, censorship battles — appear and resolve with surprisingly little friction. The dramatic tension often dissipates because the show seems more interested in visual gloss than in digging deep into the grind of transformation. The sex scenes, which one might expect to be daring given the subject matter, are described as “bland and rigid … lacking sensuality.”
In terms of historical fidelity, as is often the case with dramatizations, creative liberties are taken. The show is inspired by real life, but does not pretend to be a strict biography of Tattilo or Playmen. Many characters and incidents are fictionalised or rearranged. For instance, while Tattilo truly did take over Playmen and expand its reach, the depiction of her husband, the timing of events, and specific subplots (such as those involving Elsa or certain police cases) are dramatised for narrative clarity. That said, the core of Tattilo’s mission — to use the magazine as a platform for women’s voices and to challenge sexual conservatism — remains largely intact, and the series mostly succeeds in contextualising its protagonist’s work within the changing tides of 1970s Italy.
One of the show’s interesting thematic strands is the question of how commercial erotic media intersects — and clashes — with feminist ideals. Tattilo’s magazine is at once accused of commodifying the female body and of empowering women by giving them choice and visibility. The series doesn’t always resolve that tension elegantly: at times the editorial pivot reads more like a convenient shift than a deeply explored evolution. But the attempt is worth noting — especially at a time when debates around sex, agency and representation remain hot topics globally. The show invites viewers to reflect: what has changed in the intervening decades, and how do the impulses, hypocrisies and conflicts of that era echo today? One reviewer observed that the show implies “nothing much has changed in 2025” when it comes to attitudes toward women and sex.
Midgard Times
In viewing terms, Mrs Playmen is rich in aesthetic appeal: the costumes, production design and cinematography all align to conjure a Rome in flux — beautiful, charged, forbidden. The magazine’s offices, the homes, the nightlife all feel credibly of their moment. For viewers drawn to period dramas, especially ones rooted in European culture, this aspect is compelling. The use of music also helps ground the series. But for those expecting deep psychological complexity or a more radical deconstruction of patriarchy, the show may feel somewhat restrained — the implications of its subject matter could have been probed more aggressively.
Pacing is another mixed area. At seven episodes, the show moves rapidly through key developments: the husband’s flight, the business takeover, the editorial re-vision, the feminist activism, the censorship battles, the launch of new issues, personal relationships. Some viewers may feel the transitions too quick, the emotional arcs compressed. Women’s interior lives and the messy process of change sometimes get sidelined in favour of magazine-launch set pieces or suspense around legal threats. As one critic noted: the show “tells the story at a brisk pace … giving the impression of cramming everything into a tight space for easy consumption.”
Midgard Times
That said, the series does have standout moments. One such is the scene where the magazine publishes nude photos of an ordinary young woman (Elsa) without fully informed consent, and Tattilo’s response to that injustice. This thread highlights the complexities of choice, power and media exposure. Another moment of merit is when the magazine uses a scandalous murder-suicide case (the real-life case of the Casati Stampa couple is referenced) to shift its tone: rather than simply capitalizing on voyeuristic imagery, Tattilo chooses to contextualise the story, exploring what drives such tragedies in a culture of repression.
The series also engages with Italian social and political history — the backdrop of divorce being outlawed, the influence of the Christian Democrats and the Vatican, the changing status of women, the censorious state apparatus eager to shut down magazines like Playmen. These threads give the series more weight than a mere “scandal magazine” origin story. For example, one review mentions that when Tattilo launches an issue titled “The Erotic Bride”, letters pour in from women across Italy thanking the magazine for giving voice to what was once untouchable. This framing helps elevate the series from mere sensationalism toward something more culturally meaningful.
From a viewer engagement standpoint, Mrs Playmen will probably work best for audiences who enjoy stylish period dramas that mix biography with mythic ambition, and who have an appetite for media history, feminist narratives and luxury visuals. If one approaches it as a glossy entertainment piece with some social resonance, one is likely to be pleased. But if one expects a deeply nuanced historical study or an overt critique of patriarchy and media exploitation, the show may fall short of highest expectations. The biggest let-down is that at times it shies away from messy ambiguity in favour of tidy resolution. The obstacles Tattilo faces often appear as individual events rather than systemic struggles, and the broader culture doesn’t always feel as organic a character as it might.
In comparing it to similar works, one might draw parallels to series like The New Look or The Good Mothers in its blending of fashion/media worlds with social change, but Mrs Playmen falls somewhere in the middle: more serious than mere entertainment, less radical than documentary-drama hybrids. Indeed one preview review lists the show alongside titles for those who liked “Minx … The New Look … The L Word: Generation Q.”
Ultimately, Mrs Playmen succeeds in giving us a lead character worth caring about in an era and industry we might not have known much about. The rising, reinvention of a magazine, the moral / commercial tensions, the backdrop of conservative Italy all provide fertile ground. Tattilo emerges as a subject whose contradictions (Catholic mother, erotic publisher; spouse and businesswoman; risk-taker and social provocateur) make her compelling. The series’ ability to conjure the vibe of 1970s Rome and to surface questions around media, gender and freedom should not be underestimated. On the other hand, the lack of deeper character study, the somewhat superficial resolution of conflicts, and the occasional glossing over of messier historical complexities keep it from being great.
In sum: Mrs Playmen is an attractive, thought-provoking piece of television with strong production values and a performance that anchors it well; it offers enough substance to keep you engaged, and opens up a fascinating chapter of media history. But if you come seeking a deeply layered, uncompromising critique of the era or of the magazine business, you may find it lacking in the final stretch. It invites reflection on how far cultural attitudes have shifted — and how much remains the same — yet does so in a manner that keeps the viewer comfortable rather than deeply unsettled. Given its subject matter, that is a bit of a disappointment, but not enough to spoil the pleasures of watching it.
If I were to assign a tentative grade, I’d say Mrs Playmen achieves a very good level — perhaps around 7/10 — but misses the opportunity to be outstanding. It’s worth watching, especially for the setting and the theme, and I’d recommend it to viewers who like their dramas elegant, socially aware and set in a world where sex, media and power intertwine.
